Sunday, March 30, 2014

30th March 2014 - KCChongnz BIMB WA

A case study of company warrant of BIMB kcchongnz

Author: kcchongnz   |   Publish date: Sun, 30 Mar 11:55 

A case study of company warrant of BIMB kcchongnz

Recently many companies in Bursa carry out fund raising of right issues for debt reduction, business expansion, acquisition etc. To entice the existing shareholders to subscribe to the right issues, detachable warrants were purported given free.
Company warrant is a derivative instrument, like a call option, which gives the holders the right, but not an obligation, to subscribe for new ordinary shares at a specified price during a specified period of time. Warrants have a maturity date (up to 10 years) after which they expire are worthless unless the holder had exercised to subscribe for the new shares before the maturity date.
Why invest in company warrant?
Because the prices of warrants are low, and hence the relative much lower investment outlay, the leverage andgearing they offer is high. This means that there is a potential for larger capital gains. Warrants generally exaggerate share price movements in terms of percentage change, and hence a perfect security in a bull market.
To be fair, warrants also experience outsized declines in a falling market, or even a total loss when the warrant expires out-of-the-money. However, as the investment outlay is low, there is a limit of that loss.
A holder of a warrant does not have any voting, shareholding or dividend rights. The investor can therefore have no say in the functioning of the company, even though he or she is affected by any decisions made.
Punters should also be aware that warrant trading can be tricky because many don't have a lot of liquidity. Before buying, the cardinal rule is that investors have to like the company, not just be looking for a quick trading profit.
Hence investors who are interested in investing in warrants should buy warrants only on stocks they are confident about. Furthermore, you should invest only in warrants with a long expiry date, say at least two years of remaining life, enough time to allow a bullish scenario to play out. Finally, investors should insist that any warrant they buy offers leverage that will result in a high percentage rise say at least double the move in the underlying share.
Basic Pricing of Options
Investing in company warrant is similar to investing in a stock, or in fact it is the same as buying anything. What is the appropriate price to pay for estimated value of the warrant?
The two components of the value of the warrants are the intrinsic value and the time value. The intrinsic value is the difference between the underlying's share price and the exercise price. Specifically, the intrinsic value for a warrant  is equal to the underlying price minus the exercise price. Any premium that is in excess of the warrant's intrinsic value is referred to as time value.
Many people investing in warrants only look at a couple of things. First is the premium, or the cost of owning the warrant measured by:
Premium = Warrant price + exercise price - underlying share price, or
Premium % = (warrant price + exercise price) / underlying share price -1
The highly the premium, the higher the warrant price appears to be. Normally in an efficient market, warrants are quoted at very high premiums in tenths of percentage points, or even multiple times, depending on some factors described below.
The other factor is the gearing measured by:
Gearing = underlying share price / Warrant price.
The higher the gearing, the more attractive is the warrant as the more exaggerated the gain would be. However, just looking at these two considerations alone is a little too simplistic.
Factors influencing and the pricing of warrants
The six major factors influencing the price of options are:
  1. underlying share price,
  2. exercise price,
  3. expected volatility of the underlying share,
  4. time to expiry,
  5. interest rate and
  6. dividends.
Warrants with high underlying share prices, low exercise prices of course would generally be higher priced as they are generally are or close to in-the-money. The more time to expiration, the greater the time value of the option. In general, investors are willing to pay a higher premium for more time, since time increases the likelihood that the position can become profitable. Time value decreases over time and decays to zero at expiration.
 Volatility of the share price movement also command a higher warrant price as it has a higher chance that the underlying stock prices can go up higher, and hence the better payoff for the warrants. The volatility of the underlying share price plays a very big part in the pricing of its warrant. A warrant trading at a high implied volatility is considered as expensive.
High dividend yield for the underlying stock is a damper for warrant holders as they are not entitled to the payment. On the other hand, if company constantly has been engaging in share buyback, it is good for warrant holders as the price of underlying would move up due to share buyback.
Notice that the gearing does not physically come into the pricing consideration. It merely amplifies the gain or loss. But in real life, investors do pay higher price for a similar warrant.
For more information about options and their pricing using the Black-Scholes Option pricing Model , please refer to the appended link.
http://www.investopedia.com/university/options-pricing/

A case study on BIMB Wa
BIMB Holdings Berhad is engaged in the Islamic banking, Takaful and others such as investment holding, currency trading, ijarah financing, stockbroking and unit trust. Its share price has dropped from a high of closed to RM5.00 six months ago to RM4.23 now, mainly due to its poorer performance for its final quarter result ended 31stDecember 2013 resulting from a one-off tax charge of dividend income. Its full year result remains unchanged with earnings per share of 24 sen.
With its recent acquisition of 49% equity interest in Bank Islam, it is expected that there will be substantial increase in earnings in the future.  CIMB gave it a target price of RM5.45 a month ago.
BIMB and its warrant, Wa closed at RM4.23 and 66 sen respectively on 28th March 2014. The exercise price of Wa is RM4.72 and the expiry date is on 4th December 2023, or in nine and a half years time. The warrant is hence way out-of-the-money with zero intrinsic value. The premium now is 27% [(0.66+4.72)/4.23-1].  The value of Wa is purely in its time value, a value which is considerable due to its long expiry date. The gearing is 6.4 times (4.23/0.66) which is reasonably high and hence attractive. Hence Wa appears to be a good alternative in investing in the business of BIMB.
Black-Scholes Option Pricing
With the underlying share price at RM4.23, exercise price of RM4.72, 9.7 years to maturity, a dividend yield of 1.7%, risk-free rate of 4% and a historical volatility of BIMB at 29.5%, the option value of Wa is RM1.41. This shows Wa at 66 sen, is apparently trading at 53% undervalued.
The implied volatility, by forcing the warrant value equals to its market price, is only 12.3%, a relatively low value which signifying a cheap price for Wa.
Payoff for BIMB warrant
Table 1 below shows the payoff for Wa for various price of BIMB before expiry of the warrant.
Table 1: Payoff
Uly Price
4.00
4.23
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
BIMB
-5.4%
0.0%
6.4%
18.2%
30.0%
41.8%
53.7%
65.5%
Wa
-100.0%
-100.0%
-100.0%
-57.6%
18.2%
93.9%
169.7%
245.5%
If the price of the underlying share does not move above RM4.72, the exercise price, when Wa expires, it will be worthless. Your initial outlay is the limit of your total loss. However, if BIMB share price moves up by 66% to RM7.00, Wa can be exercised for a gain of 246%, about 4 times more than the gain in the underlying share. Figure 1 below depicts the payoff at different price of BIMB.
Figure 1: Payoff for underlying share and warrant of BIMB


Conclusion
BIMB Wa, with a long time to expiry,  is trading at an undemanding valuation in terms of premium of 27% and implied volatility of just 12.3% compared to its historical volatility of 29.5%. Furthermore, it has a high gearing of 6.4 times which would greatly amplify the gain if the underlying share price goes up before the expiry date.  Hence, if you believe in a company like BIMB as an investment, Wa is definitely an excellent buy.

K C Chong (30/3/14)
Share this  
LabelsBIMBBIMB-WA
Related Stocks
ChartStock NameLastChangeVolume 
BIMB4.23+0.01 (0.24%)403,200 
BIMB-WA0.66+0.015 (2.33%)686,800 

Saturday, March 15, 2014

16th March 2014 - Finance Intro

Everything You Need to Know About Finance and Investing in Under an Hour - ininvestbullbear

Author: Tan KW   |   Publish date: Sat, 15 Mar 16:04 


 Everything You Need to Know About Finance and Investing in Under an Hour (A good introduction)



http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/kianweiaritcles/48365.jsp
 


@ 13.00  What is risk?
@ 15.30  How to grow the business?
@ 17.40  How to Value a Business?
@ 21.37  Investing (Compounding)  Start Early, Avoid Losses, Compound at high rates of return.
@ 24.00  Avoiding significant losses.  Rule 1:  Never lose money
@ 25.00  Rules for Successful Investing:
@ 33.30  When to Invest?
@ 34.40  The Psychology of Investing
@ 35.50  How to withstand market volatility
@ 36.50  Mutual funds
@ 42.30  Investing in Yourself (Author read the Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham at age of 22)


Rules for Successful Investing:
Don't invest in start-ups
Aim for 10% - 15% per year
Invest in public companies
Understand how the company makes money
Invest at a reasonable price
Invest in a company that you could own forever
Find a company with very little debt
Find a company with profits that far outweigh its interest payments
Look for high barriers to entry
Invest in a company immune to extrinsic factors
Invest in a company with low reinvestment cost
Avoid businesses with controlling shareholders


The Best Investments:
Don't require a lot of reinvestment capital
Generate a healthy cash flow to pay out in dividends to shareholders.


Examples:  Coca Cola, McDonalds
Find a business that:
1.  You understand
2.  Has a record of success
3.  Makes an attractive profit
4.  Can grow over time.


Businesses that last:
1.  Sell a product people need
2.  Sell a unique product (franchise product)
3.  Elicit brand loyalty consumers are willing to pay for


How to withstand market volatility:
Be financially secure
Don't get spooked by short-term fluctuations
Do your own work
Invest at a reasonable price (relative to the earnings)


A good money manager:
1.  Can easily explain investment strategy (in 2 mins)
2.  Has a good reputation
3.  Has a value approach
4.  Has a successful track record of at least 5 years
5.  Has a consistent approach
6.  Invests own money in the fund.



WILLIAM ACKMAN, Activist Investor and Hedge-Fund Manager

We all want to be financially stable and enjoy a well-funded retirement, and we don't want to throw out our hard earned money on poor investments. But most of us don't know the first thing about finance and investing. Acclaimed value investor William Ackman teaches you what it takes to finance and grow a successful business and how to make sound investments that will grant you to a cash-comfy retirement.

The Floating University
Originally released September 2011.
 
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2014/03/everything-you-need-to-know-about.html

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Hevea - 12th March 2014

Author: JhoLow   |   Latest post: Wed, 26 Feb 00:04
  

5 Reasons Why You Should Own HEVEA (5095) (Part 3)

Author: JhoLow   |   Publish date: Tue, 11 Mar 23:51 



5 Reasons Why You Should Own HEVEA (5095)
Part 3 of a 6-Parts Series



3)    Cost Control and Pricing Power
In an attempt to dissect the financial performances and future prospects on the various listed furniture manufacturing peers of Hevea, it may be necessary to enlist below their respective and latest available results :

                                                        Hevea          Homeriz        Latitud       Pohuat          Liihen
      
Revenue (RM m)                              389.5            112.9           361.5          357.97           316.0
    Changes (2012/2013)                  +4.5%           +9.3%          +38%          -8.7%            -8.7%

Net Profit (RM m)                              22.31            15.12           33.6           16.78              17.9
    Changes (2012/2013)                  +42.9%          +2.8%        +138%        +10.6%          -16%          

Earning Per Share (sen)                   24.68               7.6            34.54          14.8                29.8

Market Cap (RM m)                           115.7            142.0           256.6         155.3             109.8  

Issued Shares (m shares)                   90.4             200.0            97.2          113.4               60.0

Price Earning Ratio                            5.18x             9.34x            7.64x        10.83x            6.14x
    @ 7/3/2014                                   @1.28            @0.71          @2.64       @1.37            @1.83

Net Tangible Asset (RM)                     2.55              0.44               2.78          1.47              2.43

Discount to Market Price                    50%             -161%             5.0%           7%               25%

Earning Capacity                               19.3%            10.7%          13.1%         10.8%            16.3%
***all data are as at 7/3/2014

One has to take note that Hevea per se is not in direct competition with any of its peers as Hevea is in the high-end particle board and ready-to-assemble furniture business. Homeriz specializes in leather furniture while Latitud, Pohuat and Liihen compete head-on with each other in the crowded rubber wood furniture sector. The closest nemesis of Hevea should be Mieco Chipboard Berhad but the latter’s financial and stock market performance has lagged the current pack of contenders by miles and therefore it is out of this assessment.
On a revenue basis for the FY2013 ended December 31, Hevea came up top with RM 389.5m with Latitud next at RM 361.5m. Nevertheless, Latitud scored the highest percentage of Year-on-Year gain in revenue with a leap of almost 38% over the previous year. However, this 38% or RM 99.5m increase in revenue include the equity accounting of all the subsidiaries of Latitude International Group Limited (“LIGL”), a company listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange (“SGX”) which Latitud acquired in FY2013. Latitud prior years turnover have been somewhat consistent, having reported RM 262m, RM265m, RM 290m and RM 262m for the FY 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009. Had it not because of the equity accounting of LIGL, Latitud FY2013 revenue would have been flat. On a 5-years basis (FY2009 to FY2013), suffice to say that Latitud’s revenue is stuck in the RM 260m+ range with little growth.
Meanwhile, Pohuat and Liihen who are both based in Muar, Johor, coincidentally reported a drop of an identical 8.7% in their revenue for FY2013. Pohuat disclosed a revenue of RM 392m, RM 359m, RM 356m and RM 330m for FY 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009. By looking at this set of numbers, one would have thought that the revenue of Pohuat is in the range of RM 360m per year, and the FY2013’s RM 357.97m falls exactly in this range. Again, on a 5-years basis, there is hardly any growth in term of revenue expansion by Pohuat.
It’s same kampong contemporary, Liihen somehow showed a little encouragement. Although witnessing a drop of 8.7% in its revenue to RM 316m in FY2013, Liihen has been able to display an escalation of business done on a 5-years basis, having registered RM 347m, RM 285m, RM 261m and RM 219m for FY 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
The same trend of an escalating revenue can also be found in Hevea as well, as it turned in RM 372m, RM 373m, RM 363m and RM 327m for FY 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
We are going to leave out Homeriz in the discussion of revenue for now because all these contenders except Homeriz are in the wood-based furniture sector, which bring us to the most pressing and important factor – the raw material in the name of rubber wood.
Most of us, if not all, would agree that the rubber trees have long ceded its economic prowess to oil palm. With the fast diminishing acreage of rubber tree plantations in place for the more economically viable and less labour intensive oil palm estates, manufacturers of rubber wood furniture were having tough time in sourcing cost effective and a steady supply of rubber wood.
The contenders here have adopted different strategy to deal with this major headache. Some have gone abroad to set up shops in order to be closer to the source of raw material. Latitud and Pohuat are the two  that have a major throughput subsidiary in Vietnam, now the world’s second largest rubber trees planter. As a matter of fact, Latitud’s Vietnam subsidiary contributed RM 289.9m in FY2013 revenue vis-à-vis RM 73.3m from it’s Malaysia operation. At the same time, Pohuat’s Vietnam subsidiary contributed RM 224m as compare to RM 127m from Malaysia in FY2013.
Latitud and Pohuat may seems to be benefitted from the abundant source of rubber wood supplies and the considerably lower labour cost in Vietnam economically, but it is also a dagger that cut both ways. For the same reason that Latitud and Pohuat are setting up factories in Vietnam, the home grown Vietnamese rubber wood furniture manufacturers are not lagging in seizing the same opportunities the country has to offered. As a matter of fact, this frenzy has propelled Vietnam to become the second largest furniture exporter in the world, trailing behind China.
Liihen, however decided to go upstream by setting up its own rubber trees plantation in Johor through a lease and profit sharing joint venture with a state-owned institution, Perbadanan Islam Johor in 2005. Unfortunately, until today this effort has failed to takeoff as planned due to the various stakeholders, bureaucracy and political interference. There were probably not less than two false and futile starts that Liihen is going ahead with the plan, based on the official announcement disclosed by Liihen since 2005.
On the other hand, the acute shortage of rubber wood posed no major threat to Hevea’s revenue and bottom line. Firstly, rubber wood as a percentage on the cost of raw material is less than 50% of the finished products of Hevea as the composition of particle board consists of various type of sub-grade tropical wood slabs and off cuts, as well as arcasia, a type of plantation wood which can be sourced cheaply and abundantly. Secondly, unlike Latitud, Pohuat or Liihen which uses the best part of a rubber tree trunks to make their furniture, Hevea on the contrary is using the residues of these rubber trees and henceforth the much cheaper cost input.
The ability of Hevea to control the cost of its raw materials helped to justify the much higher Earning Capacity (Net Profit over Market Capitalization) of an impressive 19.3%, trumping its nearest peer Liihen’s 16.3%.
Liihen may be enjoying the second highest Earning Capacity for now but its honeymoon will soon be interrupted by the entering to the ring of bedroom furniture business which is Liihen’s main forte, of another lesser known contender, Sern Kou Resources Berhad. As reported in the Annual Report 2012 of Sern Kou, in order to address the overcapacity issue now faced by its production lines, Sern Kou is making its foray big time into the bedroom furniture business to compete head-on with Liihen and the likes. Consequently, expect to see the margin compression in the book of Liihen soon. By the way, could this be the reason why Liihen lost RM 30m business and an evaporation of RM 3.4m in net profit in FY2013 despite the more favourable USD?
It is important to point out here that despite the stiff competitions among Latitud, Pohuat, Liihen, Sern Kou as well as the hundred of Vietnamese manufacturers for a bigger slice of the rubber wood furniture market, none of them has been able to establish a brand name of their own as almost all served only as a contract manufacturer for USA, Europe, Middle East and Japan retail chains and conglomerates.
It goes without saying that contract manufacturers lived on the whim and fancy of their customers. This business relationship of a giant and a kid also deprived of the contract manufacturers’ pricing power. Without the power or ability to dictate pricing simply translate into limited profit margin. In order to break away from contract manufacturing and to have pricing power yourself is to establish your own brand name. And this is a daunting task and history has shown just too many wing clippers. In the name of survival or staying afloat, many preferred to remain a contract manufacturer. Latitud, Pohuat and Liihen included. But not Hevea and Homeriz. 
Hevea is indisputably recognized now as the largest particle board manufacturer in Asia. Best of all, it is in the business of high end particle board sector and therefore able to command premium on its products. To add a feather to Hevea’s cap, it has also successfully carved itself out as a “branded” product. In the home furnishing and furniture markets of China, Hevea or 亿维雅 as it is widely known there, is synonymous to top choice or the choice for home decoration and furnishing. Please google the word亿维雅to convince yourself of Hevea’s reputation in China.
It is note worthy to mention that Hevea is also the preferred contract manufacturer for Aeon Retails Inc of Japan, in supplying ready-to-assemble cabinets and furniture for all Aeon’s outlets worldwide. To meet the stringent JIS requirements (“Japanese Industrial Standards”) by the Japanese Standards Association, AEON Japan has stationed two resident Japanese quality control engineers at Hevea’s plant in Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, to monitor the manufacturing process. This is a testimony of highest standard not found in Latitud, Pohuat, Liihen or Homeriz. 
At home, Hevea had bagged numerous Best Supplier awards by Giant Hypermarket, Tesco and AEON in term of product quality, services and customer complains.
With the successful establishment and the relentless continuance of highest product quality together with proprietary brand name comes the pricing power in Hevea’s disposal, which has already set the right trajectory in yielding tremendous growth and profits in the coming years.


http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/marketpulse/48164.jsp


Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Wellcall - 27th Feb 2014

Well done, WellCall Holding? - chyithong

Author: Tan KW   |   Publish date: Wed, 26 Feb 22:46 


Wednesday, February 26, 2014 
 
Rubber hose manufacturer, Wellcall Holding Berhad just released its quarter report today. 
 
Revenue and net profit increased 11.2% and 38.44% respectively compared with corresponding period last year. Gross margin and net profit margin improved to 31.5% and 20.4% respectively. Lower material cost, favourable foreign exchange gain and higher utilisation of production capacity are the main causes for the improved performance. Quarter EPS is 5.43 cents. 
 
 
However, if compared with previous quarter, the group actually recorded a dip in net profit which was not in line with the increase in revenue. The report stated that decrease in the bottom line are mainly because the group is more aggressive in their pricing strategy to secure new customers and new market segment. It will help them to have a better preparation in terms of purchase order and forecast in view of the additional production capacity once the new factory is in operation. 
 
In terms of balance sheet, everything stayed normal with a net cash position and no borrowings at all. Operating cash flow remained strong, or even better with better control in working capital changes. The group also spent around RM5 mils in capex this quarter which is consider higher compared to previous few quarters. 
 
Export market still the main contributor with 89.5% contribution to the group's revenue, while the rest came from locally. With the stronger USD nowadays compared to previous quarters as well as the continue dropping trend of rubber price will benefit the group directly. The tariff hike starting in Jan should have pose no problem for the group as electricity cost contributed quite small to the total production costs. The report did not update the progress of the new factory, but based on previous report, the new factory will be ready at the first quarter next year. Hopefully no delay. 
 
Hopefully, the group able to record at least 5.0 cents EPS for the remaining quarters given the favourable circumstances. 
 
5.0 cents quarter dividend being declared, on track to have at least 20 cents full year dividends to support its high PE and share split will be done at the end of March later. 
 
Can I say well done, wellcall? But I know your PE is quite high ... can you give me some discounts, pls? 
http://chyithong.blogspot.com/2014/02/well-done-wellcall-holding.html

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

18th Feb - Oil& Gas Comparison

Oil & Gas: A Simple Comparison - Bursa D

Author: Tan KW   |   Publish date: Tue, 18 Feb 16:31 


Tuesday, 18 February 2014 
Because of Petronas's RM300bil capex from 2011-2015, Oil & Gas sector has been tipped to have a very good prospect ahead.
 
True enough, many Oil & Gas stocks in Bursa Malaysia have made handsome gain in 2013.
 
This positive trend is widely believed to continue in 2014, and personally I believe so.
 
 
 
At the moment I do not own any O&G related stocks in my portfolio. I just sold Pantech, which has an indirect exposure to the O&G field, in January.
 
I wish to have a good O&G stock to keep throughout year 2014. The problem is, I find it difficult to value an O&G company, as my current knowledge in O&G is very limited.
 
As the share price of most O&G stocks have rallied, most of them seem to be traded at high PE now. Is it too late to go in?
 
However, many of those O&G companies have acquired new contracts or made new acquisition for the past one year. Surely their profits are going to rise in the near future.
 
Most companies have billions worth of contracts on hand. But I don't know when & how the contracts turn into profit and what is the profit margin.
 
In other words, it's hard for me to predict the future earning of an O&G company. Thus, I don't know its fair value base on my style of valuation and investment.
 
If I really want to own an O&G company's shares, I think I have to follow analyst's recommendation.
 
 
       From The Edge, Feb14
 
From the table above, Deleum & SKPetro have the most upside potential, which is about 20%. Since SKPetro is a big cap company with recent big acquisition, should I just put my money in SKPetro?
 
Another table below represents a simple comparison between most O&G companies in Bursa Malaysia. Forward PE are derived from annualized net profit.
 
For consistency, I'll use the target price by RHB as reference, unless RHB's target price is too outdated or if no RHB coverage, I'll get the latest or median value among the target prices.
 
 
 PriceDY%PEFwd PENTAOrder bookTP
ALAM1.570.220.913.10.751.4bil (Nov13)2.25 (RHB Feb13)
ARMADA3.980.830.225.41.4612.0bil (Feb14)4.50 (RHB Jan14)
BARAKAH1.81NA27.427.40.362.3bil (Jan14)1.85 (MB Feb14)
COASTAL4.451.318.215.31.972.5bil (Feb14)4.51 (KNG Feb14)
DAYA0.440.631.424.40.202.1bil (Dec13)0.42 (RHB Nov13)
DAYANG3.842.624.319.81.175.0bil (Jan14)4.48 (RHB Dec13)
DELEUM4.753.216.014.31.523.4bil (Nov13)5.12 (ALA Nov13)
DIALOG3.351.042.434.20.60 3.71 (RHB Feb14)
MHB3.642.724.624.61.622.6bil (Feb14)3.60 (KNG Feb14)
PENERGY2.370.4103.050.41.503.0bil (Nov13)2.45 (RHB Nov13)
PERDANA1.92NANA25.61.041.4bil (Feb14)1.90 (RHB Jan14)
PERISAI1.67NA19.619.10.82 1.62 (RHB Feb14)
SCOMIES1.13NANA26.50.275.3bil (Feb14)1.02 (HLG Feb14)
SKPETRO4.45NA50.926.61.6425bil (Jan14)6.75 (CIMB Feb14)
TAS1.221.616.37.30.92401mil (Oct13)1.57 (RHB Oct13)
TGOFFS0.61NANA22.60.55  
UMWOG4.38NANA49.80.681.4bil (Dec13)4.80 (MB Feb14)
UZMA6.400.337.623.70.931.3bil (Nov13)6.16 (HLG Jan14)
WASEONG1.952.728.775.61.261.7bil (Nov13)2.25 (RHB Jan14)
YINSON7.770.258.933.31.677.5bil (Dec13)7.32 (KNG Jan14)
 
 
From the table above, most of the companies are traded either very close or above their target prices, except those companies marked in red.
 
Among all those which are still "undervalued", Alam Maritim (43%) & Sapura Kencana (52%) have the most upside potential.
 
So, it is clear that SKPetro, who also has the largest value of contracts (a mammoth RM25bil), is the one that stands out.
 
Others that worth to study further include Alam Maritim, Deleum & Tas Offshores.
 
 
 
 
The analysis above do not include other important valuation such as ROE, debt analysis, profit margin, future growth potential etc.
 
Anyway, I don't think I will study all these companies in detail. May be I'll concentrate on the 4 mentioned above.

The blogger of 十面埋伏 has done a great job with numerous articles (in Chinese) related to Oil & Gas industry and its related companies. I have gained a lot from those articles, but still not fully confidence in investing in O&G yet...
 
If I already have other stock that I think can fetch higher return compared to all these O&G stocks, should I still waste my time to study O&G stocks and buy just for the sake of buying?

Or the opportunity in O&G is something that should not be missed?

 
http://bursadummy.blogspot.com/2014/02/oil-gas-simple-comparison.html